Ohio Soybean Performance Trials 2010
Chris D. Kroon Van Diest, Research Associate, Dept. of
Horticulture & Crop Science
Douglas Kroon Van Diest, Research Assistant, Dept. of
Horticulture & Crop Science
Ohio State University
Extension /OARDC
The Ohio State University, College of Food, Agriculture and Environmental
Science
INTRODUCTION
The purpose of the Ohio Soybean Performance Trials is to evaluate soybean varieties for yield,
and other agronomic characteristics. This evaluation gives soybean producers comparative
information for selecting the best varieties for their unique production systems.
METHOD OF CONDUCTING TRIALS
Entries
in trials. Performance of entries in the Ohio Soybean Performance Trials are
published if seed will be available to Ohio Soybean producers for the
following planting season. All 2010 entries were submitted voluntarily by
seed companies and the Ohio Seed Improvement Association. Entry fee charges
were made per entry and location.
Normal (including Liberty Link) (N) and Roundup Ready (RR) Test.
The same production, testing and evaluation techniques,
except for weed control, were used for Normal tests and Roundup Ready tests. The
performance of Normal(including Liberty Link) entries and Roundup Ready entries
is not comparable statistically because they were not tested together and
because different weed control programs were used for the two tests.
FIELD PLOT DESIGN
The entries for each test site were planted in a
randomized complete-block design. Each entry was replicated four times and
planted in plots 40 ft. long and 5 ft. wide containing four rows seeded at
140,000 seeds per acre.
PRODUCTION PRACTICES AND RAINFALL
The production practices used at each location
are shown in Table 1.
Table 1.
2010
Cultural Practices by Test Site
|
|
N1 |
N2 |
C1 |
C2 |
S1 |
S2 |
|
Henry
Co. |
Erie
Co. |
Mercer
Co. |
Delaware
Co. |
Preble
Co. |
Clinton
Co. |
Fall Tillage |
None |
None |
Field Cult. |
None |
None |
None |
Spring Tillage |
None |
None |
None |
None |
None |
None |
Soil
Type |
Hoytville |
Kibbie |
Mercer |
Blount |
Crosby |
Westland |
Soil pH |
6.4 |
6.4 |
6.8 |
7.5 |
6.8 |
6.5 |
Soil Test P(ppm) |
34 |
55 |
21 |
91 |
83 |
25 |
Soil Test K(ppm) |
200 |
271 |
158 |
488 |
520 |
199 |
Fertilizer |
0-0-0 |
0-0-0 |
0-0-0 |
0-0-0 |
0-0-0 |
0-0-0 |
Previous Crop |
Corn |
Corn |
Corn |
Corn |
Corn |
Corn |
Plant Date |
5/29 |
5/28 |
5/30 |
5/27 |
5/30 |
6/1 |
Harvest Date |
10/12 |
10/21 |
10/13 |
10/7 |
10/14 |
10/8 |
Normal Variety
Weed Control
|
Preemerge |
Valor XLT/Dual II/Roundup UltraMax |
Postemerge |
Basagran/Flexstar/SelectMax |
RR Variety
Weed Control
|
Preemerge |
Valor XLT/Dual II/Roundup UltraMax |
Postemerge |
Roundup UltraMax/SelectMax |

MEASUREMENTS AND RECORDS
Relative maturity.
Relative maturity is a rating designed to account for all of the factors that
affect maturity date and includes variety, planting date, weather, latitude and
disease. Maturity is defined as the "95% brown pods" stage. A variety with a
Relative Maturity rating of 3.5 will reach the 95% brown pod stage 5 days later
than a variety with a rating of 3.0. The varieties in each table were tested as
a group, and their performance analyzed and reported for that group.
Lodging score. There
was no lodging in 2010.
Seed size is reported as seeds per pound.
Protein and oil %
Analysis was determined by near infrared transmittance technology. The test was
performed by the OSU Grain Quality Lab using a Tecator Infratec whole grain
analyzer calibrated with the Composition Systems Calibration developed at Iowa
State University and is reported at 13% moisture.
Phytophthora Resistance.
(Anne Dorrance, Professor, Plant Pathology): Seed for all of the entries
during 2010 were treated. I received untreated sample seed Nov 16, 2010, and will begin testing in
January. The reason for this delay is we are testing the repaired greenhouses at
Wooster to assess the feasibility of evaluating the performance trials. When the
samples are evaluated, it will be similar to the procedure described below.
Phytophthora Resistance Genes.
Phytophthora resistance genes were determined using a hypocotyl inoculation
test. In this test, several races of Phytophthora are used to determine the
presence or absence of a particular Rps gene. The Rps genes (Rps1a, Rps1c, etc.)
detected in a variety are listed in Tables 3-11. ND indicates that the Rps
gene(s) could not be determined, and the variety has Rps6, Rps8 or a Rps gene
combination of either 1c+3a or 1k + 3a. None indicates no resistance genes
were detected.
Phytophthora Partial Resistance.
All varieties were evaluated for partial resistance. Partial resistance is a
multigenic characteristic that provides some level of protection against all
known races of Phytophthora. Ratings of 3.0 to 3.9 are considered high levels of
partial resistance and will provide good levels of control. Ratings of 4.0 to
4.9 are considered moderate and will allow some yield loss when environmental
conditions favor infection by Phytophthora. Ratings of 5.0 to 5.9 indicate low
levels partial resistance or protection against Phytophthora. Ratings of 6.0 and
greater indicate very low levels and severe yield losses will result when
Phytophthora pressure is high. For fields with a history of Phytophthora root
and stem rot, varieties should have a combination of both an Rps gene plus good
partial resistance to provide the best protection.
Yield. Each soybean
variety was harvested at a moisture content between 9 and 15 percent and yields
computed to bushels per acre at 13 percent moisture.
LSD. A Least
Significant Difference (LSD) for yield was computed for each maturity group.
LSD's are reported in bushels per acre at 13 percent moisture. Yields of two
varieties within a maturity group are significantly different 70% of the time if
their yields differ by as much as or more than the LSD value shown for that
maturity group.
DATA USE
Inclusion of entries in the Ohio Soybean Performance Trials does not constitute an endorsement of a particular entry by the Ohio State University, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, or the Ohio State University Extension.
This report can be found on the internet at:
www.agcrops.osu.edu
and each column of data can be sorted
to aid the variety comparison and selection process.
Go to Ohio Crop
Performance
11/2010
All educational programs and activities conducted by Ohio
State University Extension are available to clientele on a nondiscriminatory
basis without regard to race, color, creed, religion, sexual orientation,
national origin, gender, age, disability or Vietnam-era veteran status.
Issued in furtherance of Cooperative Extension work, Acts of May 8 and June
30, 1914, in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Keith L.
Smith, Director, Ohio State University Extension.
|
|