2003 Ohio Corn Performance Test

Ohio State University Extension
Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center
The Ohio State University

Horticulture and Crop Science Series 215
November 2003

R.J. Minyo Jr.¹,  A.B. Geyer¹, P.R. Thomison¹, B.L. Bishop², and D.G. Lohnes³

Ohio Corn Performance Test, ¹Department of Horticulture and Crop Science, ²Computing & Statistical Services, and ³Communications & Technology, The Ohio State University, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center.

Tables

• Evaluation Procedures
• 1E. Performance of hybrids in the early maturity trial. SOUTHWESTERN AND WEST CENTRAL Ohio, 2003.
  1. Western Branch
  2. Washington C.H.
  3. Greenville
  4. Summary
• 1L. Performance of hybrids in the full season trial. SOUTHWESTERN AND WEST CENTRAL Ohio, 2003.
  1. Western Branch - Location Lost
  2. Washington C.H.
  3. Greenville
  4. Summary
• 2. Two year hybrid performance in SOUTHWESTERN AND WEST CENTRAL Ohio, 2002-2003.
  1. Washington C.H.
  2. Greenville
  3. Summary
• 3. Three year performance of hybrids in SOUTHWESTERN AND CENTRAL Ohio, 2001-2003
  1. Washington C.H.
  2. Greenville
  3. Summary
• 4E. Performance of hybrids in the early maturity trial. NORTHWESTERN Ohio, 2003.
  1. Van Wert
  2. Northwest Branch
  3. Upper Sandusky
  4. Summary
• 4L. Performance of hybrids in the full season trial. NORTHWESTERN Ohio, 2003.
  1. Van Wert
  2. Northwest Branch
  3. Upper Sandusky
  4. Summary
• 5. Two year hybrid performance in NORTHWESTERN Ohio, 2002-2003.
  1. Van Wert
  2. Northwest Branch
  3. Summary
• 6. Three year performance of hybrids in NORTHWESTERN Ohio, 2001-2003.
  1. Van Wert
  2. Northwest Branch
  3. Summary
• 7E. Performance of hybrids in the early maturity trial. NORTH CENTRAL AND NORTHEASTERN Ohio, 2003.
  1. Wooster
• 7L. Performance of hybrids in the full season trial. NORTH CENTRAL AND NORTHEASTERN Ohio, 2003.
  1. Wooster
• 8. COMBINED REGIONAL Summary of hybrid performance, 2003.
  1. Western Ohio (5 sites)
  2. Statewide All Regions (6 sites)
• 9. Performance of hybrids in COSHOCTON Ohio, 2001-2003.
  1. 2003
  2. 2002-2003 Two year Averages
  3. 2001-2003 Three Year Averages
• 10. Performance of hybrids in PIKETON Ohio, 2001-2003.
  1. 2003
  2. 2002-2003 Two year Averages
  3. 2001-2003 Three year Averages
• 11. Seed source of hybrids.

TEST LOCATIONS

The purpose of the Ohio Corn Performance Test is to evaluate corn hybrids for yield, grain quality, and other important agronomic characteristics. Results of the test can assist farmers in selecting hybrids best suited to their farming operations and production environments. Corn hybrids differ considerably in yield potential, standability, maturity, and other agronomic characteristics that affect profitable crop production. Hybrid selection should be based on proven performance from multiple test locations and years. The presentation of data does not imply endorsement of any hybrid by The Ohio State University.

EVALUATION PROCEDURES

Seed companies marketing corn hybrids in Ohio were invited to enter hybrids in the test. An entry fee was charged to cover expenses. Companies were permitted to enter an unlimited number of hybrids. Eleven sites were available for hybrid evaluation. Testing was available in three regions of Ohio (Southwestern and West Central; Northwestern; North Central and Northeastern). Companies were required to enter a hybrid in three sites within a testing region. Testing was also conducted at two other sites that have unique environments. The Coshocton location (east central Ohio) is in an area of high gray leaf spot incidence. The Piketon location (southern Ohio) is representative of river bottom fields in southern Ohio. Evaluation techniques for hybrids at these sites were the same as those used in the regional testing program.

Each hybrid entry in the regional trials was evaluated using three replications per site in a randomized complete block design. At Piketon and Coshocton, four replications were used. In the regional tests, hybrids were planted either in an early or full season maturity trial based on relative maturity information provided by the companies. In the Southwestern and West Central region, the relative maturity of hybrid entries in the early maturity trial was 110 days or earlier; the relative maturity of hybrid entries in the full season trial was 111 days or later. In the Northwestern region, the relative maturity of hybrid entries in the early maturity trial was 108 days or earlier; the relative maturity of hybrid entries in the full season trial was 109 days or later.
In the Northeastern region, the relative maturity of hybrid entries in the early maturity trial was 107 days or earlier; the relative maturity of hybrid entries in the full season trial was 108 days or later.

Hybrids were planted with a commercial type planter adapted for plot planting. Each plot consisted of four 30 inch rows approximately 25 feet long. Seed corn producers selected a final stand and percent overplant for each hybrid entered. Fertilizer, herbicides and insecticides were applied according to recommended cultural practices for obtaining optimum grain yields. Details concerning the establishment and management of each 2003 test are listed below.

MEASUREMENTS AND RECORDS

YIELD. The center two rows of each plot were harvested with a self propelled two row picker sheller combine. Yields were reported as bushels of grain per acre (BU/A) at 15.5 percent moisture.

MOISTURE (HARV MST). A grain moisture determination was made from each plot with an electrical conductance moisture meter. Grain moisture was reported as percent grain moisture.

LODGING (STK LDG). The number of broken stalks in each plot was determined just prior to harvest. Only those plants with a stalk broken below the ear were considered stalk lodged. Stalk lodging was reported as a percentage of final plant stand.

FINAL STAND (FINAL STD). Seed corn producers selected a desired planting rate for each hybrid entered. Differences between the planting rate and the final stand may be attributed to seed quality and/or environmental conditions present. Populations were reported in hundreds (100/A) per acre.

EMERGENCE (EMG). An emergence count was made on each plot after plant emergence. The emergence percentage was computed based on the number of plants and the number of kernels planted, and was reported as a percentage of the kernels planted.

MID SILK (SILK). The mid silk date is the Julian day of the year in which 50% of the plants show silks at one site in a region.

TEST WEIGHT (TW). Test weights were recorded in pounds per bushel on grain samples at field moisture. The results are an average of all three sites in the regional tests.

PROTEIN - OIL - STARCH (PROT-OIL-STRCH). An analysis for crude protein, oil, and starch was performed on dried samples by the OSU Grain Quality Laboratory using a near infrared transmittance whole grain analyzer with a SystemOne program calibration. Results are reported as percent protein, oil, and starch content at 15.0 percent grain moisture.

LSD 0.05 - Least Significant Differences at probability level 0.05 (LSD 0.05) are reported for yield and other agronomic characteristics. Differences between hybrids are significant only if they are equal to or greater than the LSD value. If a given hybrid out yields another hybrid by as much or more than the LSD value, then we are 95% confident (i.e. the odds are 19:1) that the yield difference is real, with only a 5% probability that the difference is due to chance variation (such as soil variation, etc.). For example, if Hybrid X is 19 Bu/A higher in yield than Hybrid Y, then this difference is statistically significant if the LSD is 19 Bu/A or less. If the LSD is 20 Bu/A or greater, then we are less confident that Hybrid X really is higher yielding than Hybrid Y under conditions of the test. If ‘NS’ is indicated for a characteristic, then the differences among hybrid entries are not significant at the 5% probability level.

2003 GROWING CONDITIONS

The 2003 growing season was characterized by above average rainfall and below average temperatures. At test sites where long-term weather data is available, rainfall totals from April to September 2003, ranged from 4.6 to 13.3 inches above normal. Soil conditions at planting were excellent and promoted uniform emergence and good stands. Rainfall was well distributed throughout the growing season and soil moisture adequate during all stages of crop growth. Cool temperatures also helped prevent moisture stress, but slowed crop development. However, most test sites reached maturity before the earlier than normal frosts on Oct. 2 and 3.

RESULTS

Results of the 2003 testing program are presented in Tables 1 to 10. The seed source and table location for hybrids tested in 2003 are shown in Table 11. In the tables for the regional trials, yields and other agronomic performance characteristics have been averaged across the individual tests and shown under the SUMMARY heading. Hybrids are listed in increasing order of summary grain moisture content at harvest in the regional trials.

Favorable growing conditions resulted in outstanding grain yields at most test sites. However, persistent rains from early May through mid June prevented timely planting of the Mahoning Co. and Bucyrus test sites, and replanting of the full season test at S. Charleston. Results of the these late planted tests were not presented because frosts occurred prior to maturity and resulted in major yield reductions.

Confidence in test results increases with the number of years and the number of locations in which the hybrid was tested. Data from a single test site should be avoided, especially if the site was characterized by abnormal growing conditions. Look for consistency in a hybrid's performance across a range of environmental conditions. Grain moisture percentage at harvest can provide a basis for comparing hybrid maturity, especially when grain moisture levels average above 20% at a test site. Yield, standability, test weight, and other comparisons should be made between hybrids of similar maturity to determine those best adapted to your farm. Since environmental conditions affect grain composition, the values reported for protein, oil, and starch should be used for comparison purposes and not as absolute values for feeding.

Acknowlegements

We thank our farmer cooperators for their contributions to the 2003 corn hybrid testing program. We are grateful for the assistance provided by Clarence Renk, OARDC Western Branch, Lynn Ault, OARDC Wooster, Matt Davis, OARDC Northwest Branch, Jim Rich, FFA/Riverview High School, Andy Kleinschmidt, OSU-Van Wert Co. Extension, and Steve Prochaska, OSU- Crawford Co. Extension.